Reconstruction of Marriage Dispensation Regulation in the Ethic Perspective of Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61181/yw5a8j27Keywords:
Marriage Dispensation, Ethic of Care, Care, Child Protection, Regulatory ReconstructionAbstract
This study aims to reconstruct the regulation of marriage dispensation in Indonesia through the perspective of Ethic of Care which emphasizes the value of care, empathy, and moral relationships in legal decision-making. The marriage dispensation regulation contained in Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 and Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) Number 5 of 2019, basically seeks to protect children from the practice of early marriage. However, in practice, many dispensation decisions are still oriented towards legal formalism and socio-economic considerations alone, not in the best interest of the child. Through the Ethic of Care approach, this research offers a new paradigm that places affective, relational, and moral aspects as the basis for consideration by judges and policymakers in determining the marriage dispensation. This approach is expected to strengthen child protection while building a more humanistic and contextual legal policy. Thus, this study concludes that the Ethic of Care can be a new ethical and philosophical foundation for family law reform in Indonesia, especially in the context of marriage dispensation. This paradigm places law not just as a system of state orders, but as a means of maintaining life (caring justice). Care-based reconstruction will strengthen the protective function of the law against girls, who have often been victims of early marriage practices due to cultural or social pressures. Finally, the implementation of Ethic of Care in the regulation of marriage dispensation is expected to be able to give birth to a family law system that is more substantive justice, responsive to human values, and morally civilized. This paradigm not only corrects the weaknesses of legal formalism, but also restores the function of law as an instrument that hears, understands, and cares for human lifeso that every legal decision is not only juridically valid, but also ethically and humanly correct.
References
Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982)
Directorate of Religious Courts of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Annual Report 2021.
Jasser Auda, Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach (London: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008)
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2019 Number 186.
Lexy J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2019)
Nel Noddings, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984)
Nel Noddings, Starting at Home: Caring and Social Policy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)
Philippe Nonet dan Philip Selznick, Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law (New York: Harper and Row, 1978)
Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Applications for Marriage Dispensation, Article 3.
Satjipto Rahardjo, Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan (Jakarta: Kompas, 2009)
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2015)
Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Maqasid al-Syari’ah al-Muta’alliqah bi al-Usrah wa al-Mar’ah (Doha: Wizarah al-Awqaf al-Qatariyyah, 2008)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yayat Dimyati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
