Kejujuran Relasional: Tinjauan Nilai Ṣidq, Self-Determination dan Family Systems untuk Memahami Kemunafikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61181/tjpc3438Keywords:
Islamic relational honesty, Muslim Family, psychology, theologyAbstract
Honesty and hypocrisy within Muslim families constitute a complex phenomenon shaped by religious values, psychological processes, and family relationship dynamics. This study aims to examine the relationship between ṣidq (honesty) and nifāq (hypocrisy) in Muslim family life from the perspectives of Islamic ethics and psychological theories, specifically Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Family Systems Theory (FST). Employing an Integrative Literature Review (ILR) approach, this study draws upon data from the Qur’an, Hadith, Islamic scholarly literature, psychological theories, and relevant empirical studies. The findings indicate that honesty within Muslim families is understood both as an individual moral obligation and as a relational process influenced by ACR (Autonomy [A], Competence [C], Relatedness [R]), psychological safety, and family interaction patterns. Excessive control, fear of rejection, punitive responses, and pressure to maintain an image of a perfect family can foster concealment and trigger a lack of alignment between values, words, and behaviors. This study proposes the concept of Islamic Relational Honesty (IRH) by integrating internalized ṣidq, psychological safety, support for meeting ACR needs, and moral alignment. IRH makes a theoretical contribution by framing honesty as a relational ecosystem, wherein Islamic values and psychological well-being mutually reinforce one another. The IRH framework offers a foundation for future research on honesty, trust, and moral development within Muslim families.
References
Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. NY: Jason Aronson.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Calatrava, M., Mariana V.M., Schweer-Collins, M., Duch-Ceballos C., & Rodríguez-González, M. (2022). Differentiation of self: A scoping review of Bowen family systems theory’s core construct. Clinical Psychology Review, 91, 102101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102101
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 4, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Fahri, H. (2025). Nifaq dalam keluarga Muslim: Kajian teologis terhadap disintegrasi rumah tangga. Al-Kamal: Jurnal Kajian Islam, 5, 2, 1–18.
Jung, C.G. (1972). Two essays on analytical psychology. Trans. R. F. C. Hull. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mozas-Alonso, M., Oliver, J., & Berástegui, A. (2022). Differentiation of self and its relationship with marital satisfaction and parenting styles in a Spanish sample of adolescents’ parents. PLOS ONE, 17, 3, e0265436. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265436
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, 1, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Shihab, M.Q. (2002). Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, kesan, dan keserasian al-Qur'an, vol. 11. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
Skowron, E.A., Van Epps, J.J. & Cipriano-Essel, E.A. (2014). Toward a greater understanding of differentiation of self in Bowen family systems theory: Empirical developments and future directions. In Peter Titelman (edt). (2014). Differentiation of self: Bowen family systems theory perspectives. 1st ed. NY: Routledge, 355–382. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203121627
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Supeno, Sokip
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
